Re: uk-policy Third way - Aspiration: too little or too

Holly Page (hpage@dlcppi.org)
Thu, 21 May 1998 18:02:35 +0100 (BST)

In response to: "If the third way represents an attempt to regulate
family life, or to split the interests of parents from children within
the family, then I vote for a fourth way."

I think this is a but of a misunderstanding, probably a result of the
limits of email...

No one is advocating "regulating family life". Instead, we want to use
government, as society's agent, to encourage responsible behavior
ESPECIALLY where children are concerned. We aren't talking about (old
think) "regulation" instead, this is about the power of incentives......

Perhaps this is not as critical an issue in Britain as in America, but
for the "new dems' to be taken seriously in the political arena we had
to confront the fact that many of our policies (welfare particularly)
incentivised against the "social norms" ... i.e. the system punished
people for working and getting married, but rewarded them for having
more babies....



-------------------------------------------------------------
Posted to uk-policy, a service of Nexus. http://www.netnexus.org/
Hosting and email provided by new media consultants On-Line Publishing